## Blended Factoring

Posted by mark schwartz on May 23, 2016

__Introduction:__

Factoring trinomials is a core operation in Algebra and is more than a stand-alone procedure. Consider how it is used in solving quadratic equations. Consider the basic algorithm for factoring. I’ve seen about 7 different ones, one of which I developed, which I call the “blended” method. This method is called blended because the core of it is the traditional procedure but it is blended with a set of operations which many students have found more comfortable. For this method, it is expected that students have studied and can perform identifying and factoring out a common factor from a binomial. So, a review of it, if not covered recently, should be done. Being able to do this is an essential part of the Blended Method. This became a student handout and was given to them at the time of practicing the procedure.

__The Story:__

When factoring a trinomial of the form ax^{2 }+ bx + c, traditionally one always looks for and factors out any common factor, referred to as a greatest common factor (GCF). Further, the method for factoring is typically presented in two steps: first, address a trinomial of the form ax^{2 }+ bx + c where a = 1, and then later, when a >1. Then there are special cases – the perfect square trinomial and the difference of two squares, which are handy but not essential. All factoring of these can be done with what is described as the blended method. It is not necessary to find the GCF, nor to pause to recognize and recall the procedure for the special cases.

It starts with a trinomial of the form ax^{2 }+ bx + c, with a = 1 but is not limited to this. This allows for exploring why the blended method works when a = 1 and also when a > 1.

For the first demonstration of how this method works, factor x^{2} + 5x + 6. The key thing to notice is that the coefficient of x^{2} is 1. So, as in the traditional method, set up two binomials as (1x )(1x ) but include the coefficient of x^{2}. It may seem odd to include the coefficient of 1 in both binomials, but it provides for a clear transition to factoring trinomials when a>1. Have students write it in cases where the coefficient of the x^{2} term is 1.

Step two is to factor both ‘a’ and ‘c’, combining these factors into one set. Typically, only pairs of factors of both ‘a’ and ‘c’ are needed but using prime factoring is very helpful. In this case the factors would be 1•2•3 (again, it seems odd but include the 1). This set then has to be played with until two products __add__ to ‘b’, the coefficient of x. For example, 1 + 2•3 = 7; 1•2 + 3 = 5, as does 1•3 + 2 = 5. Either of these latter two is acceptable. Again, this may seem trivial because ‘1’ is one of the factors but it establishes and reinforces a pattern which isn’t quite so obvious. More examples will be provided later with different sets of factors.

Place the ‘2’ and ‘3’ as the second term in each binomial, and it makes no difference which binomial. So, the factors of x^{2} + 5x + 6 are (1x + 2)(1x + 3). Again, the coefficient of 1 for the x term need not be written once students are comfortable with the procedure, but for now, they are to use it to demonstrate and emphasize the procedure. At this point, the next step is to examine each of the binomials for a common factor, and if any are found, factor them out. In this case, there are none, but in later examples this step will demonstrate why it is to be done. Try another one.

Factor x^{2} – x – 12. Step one gives (1x )(1x ). Step two gives several possibilities because ‘c’ is negative and one of the factors has to be negative. However, the factors don’t have to be handled as a positive and a negative; they could both be treated as positive, with the awareness that ** one of the products is subtracted from the other** to give the value of ─1, the coefficient of ‘b’.

Twelve has 3 sets of factors: 1•12, 2•6, and 3•4. Again, notice that prime factoring wasn’t the beginning point, but in some cases, prime factoring is recommended. Which pair can give a __difference__ of −1? The only pair with a __difference __of 1 is 3 and 4, and since we’re looking for −1, the two factors are 3 and −4. Again, multiplying either of these by 1 seems trivial (and perhaps it is in this case), so the two factors are still 3 and −4¸ and the factors of x^{2} – x – 12 are (1x +3 )(1x −4 ). Again, look for a common factor in each binomial, factoring it out if found. In this case, there are none. More practice with a = 1 is recommended before moving to cases where a>1. ** This is to establish that the coefficient of ‘x’ in both binomials is the coefficient of the x^{2} term in the trinomial**. It also provides practice in handling trinomials where ‘c’ is negative.

Now try factoring 2x^{2} – 11x – 6. In this case, the two initial binomials are (2x )(2x ). Notice that __the coefficient of ‘x’ in both binomials is the coefficient of the x ^{2} term in the trinomial.__ The factors of ‘ac’ are 1•2•2•3. These factors have to be played with until two numbers result such that their difference is ‘b’, or – 11. The outcome is 1 and 2•2•3, or 1 and 12. The 12 has to be negative because the sum has to be – 11. So, the two binomial factors of 2x

^{2}– 11x – 6 are (2x + 1)(2x −12). The next step is examining each binomial for a common factor, and in this case, (2x −12) gives 2(x – 6). So, we now have (2x + 1)•2•(x – 6). The question is whether or not the factor of 2 is part of the final factoring or not.

**The outcome is (2x + 1)(x – 6), and these are the factors of 2x**

*To determine this, divide this answer by the coefficient of x*^{2}in the original trinomial.^{2}– 11x – 6.

Here’s a summary of the steps for the blended method. Given a trinomial of the form ax^{2 }+ bx + c, where a ≥ 1:

**Write 2 binomials with only a first term in each of (ax )(ax ), where ‘a’ is the coefficient of the x**^{2}term. Indicate that this expression will be divided by ‘a’, giving the expression.**Factor ‘a’ and ‘c’, producing a set of factors containing those of ‘a’ and ‘c’. Prime factors are not required but typically make the work easier.****Use this set of factors to determine two values – “m” and “n” – which added together give the coefficient of “b”.****Write the two binomials (ax & m)(ax & n), where the “&” could be either a plus or a minus.****Extract any common factor in each binomial, identifying them as c**_{1}and c_{2}.**Cancel all common factors in c**_{1, }c_{2}and “a”.**This gives the factors of ax**^{2 }+ bx + c, two binomials and in some cases a constant.

More practice is to be done with this procedure using examples from the text, but a demonstration of how to use it for the two special cases – perfect square trinomial or difference of two squares – follows.

Factor 4x^{2} ̶ 12x + 9. First, there is no need to identify if this is a perfect square trinomial. It seems that it’s likely to be since a = 4 and c = 9, both of which are perfect squares. But for the moment, ignore that.

Step 1 then is to write (4x )(4x )**/**4 , based on step 1 of the procedure.

Step 2 gives the set of prime factors 2⦁2•3•3.

Step 3 has to give two products whose sum is 12, and that is 2⦁3 and 2⦁3. But __notice that it’s a minus twelve__ in the trinomial so, the two products have to be ̶ 6 and ̶ 6.

Step 4 gives the expression (4x ̶ 6)( 4x ̶ 6)**/**4

Step 5 gives 2(2x ̶ 3)⦁2⦁(2x ̶ 3)**/**4

Applying step 6, gives the answer of (2x ̶ 3)(2x ̶ 3).

Now factor 8 x^{2} ̶ 18. At first, it appears as though this might be the difference of two squares but it isn’t. There is a greatest common factor, and if that isn’t noticed, the question is where to start. Try the blended method.

Step 1 then is to write (8x )(8x )**/**8, based on step 1 of the procedure.

Step 2 gives 2•4•2•9.

Step 3 using 2•4•2•9 won’t give zero, the coefficient of ‘b’, so moving toward prime factoring gives 2•4•2•3•3, and this can simplify to 2•2•3 and 4•3, which is 12 and 12. Making one of them negative and adding gives zero.

Step 4 gives the expression (8x ̶ 12) (8x ̶ 12)/8

Step 5 gives 4(2x ̶ 3)⦁4⦁(2x ̶ 3)/8

Applying step 6, gives the answer of 2(2x ̶ 3) (2x + 3).

Using this process seems like a rather long way to factor as opposed to learning and recognizing the special cases of a perfect square trinomial and difference of two squares … and it may well be. However, consider learning one procedure – the blended method – or 5 procedures (a trinomial with ‘a’ equal 1, a trinomial with ‘a’ > 1, using the grouping method, a perfect square trinomial or the difference of two squares). The choice is obviously yours, but give the blended method a try. Once practiced and understood, it’s as automatic as using 4 different procedures.

__One caution__. Some texts include problems in the form ax^{3} + bx^{2} + cx. Notice that this is not the form

ax^{2} + bx + c and since it isn’t, the blended method won’t work. Given this kind of problem, the first step has to be to factor out the common term “x”, bringing the trinomial to a form that can be factored with the Blended Method.

## Leave a Reply